Skip to content

globalintegrity.org

FacebookTwitterLinkedin
Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
  • About
    • Our Programme
    • Our Team
    • Events
    • Press
    • Multimedia
  • Projects
    • Social Norms & Behaviors & Health – Tanzania
    • Advancing Integrity – Uganda
    • Leveraging Social Audits – India
    • Cities of Integrity: Zambia and South Africa
    • Integrity & Civil Servants – Nepal & Bangladesh
    • Procurement & Red Flags
    • Preventing Medical Theft – Malawi
    • Offshore Financial Secrecy Reform
    • Regulating Cross-border trading – East Africa
    • Effective Law Enforcement – Nigeria & Malawi
    • Harnessing Informality – East & Central Africa & Kyrgyzstan
    • Beneficial Ownership – Nigeria
    • International Deal-Making
    • Anti-Money Laundering & Banking/Reputation
    • Using the Red Flags tool to curb corruption in procurement
  • Re-thinking Anti-Corruption
    • Working Paper Series
      • Approaches
      • Interactive Framework
    • Short-term Research
      • Global Finance and the Enablers of Corruption
      • Crisis Responses and Corruption in Vulnerable Sectors
      • Corruption Risks in Global Trade and Commerce
  • Blog
  • Publications
  • Digital Library
  • From Research to Practice
    • Day 1
    • Day 2
    • Day 3
Search
  • About
    • Our Programme
    • Our Team
    • Events
    • Press
    • Multimedia
  • Projects
    • Social Norms & Behaviors & Health – Tanzania
    • Advancing Integrity – Uganda
    • Leveraging Social Audits – India
    • Cities of Integrity: Zambia and South Africa
    • Integrity & Civil Servants – Nepal & Bangladesh
    • Procurement & Red Flags
    • Preventing Medical Theft – Malawi
    • Offshore Financial Secrecy Reform
    • Regulating Cross-border trading – East Africa
    • Effective Law Enforcement – Nigeria & Malawi
    • Harnessing Informality – East & Central Africa & Kyrgyzstan
    • Beneficial Ownership – Nigeria
    • International Deal-Making
    • Anti-Money Laundering & Banking/Reputation
    • Using the Red Flags tool to curb corruption in procurement
  • Re-thinking Anti-Corruption
    • Working Paper Series
      • Approaches
      • Interactive Framework
    • Short-term Research
      • Global Finance and the Enablers of Corruption
      • Crisis Responses and Corruption in Vulnerable Sectors
      • Corruption Risks in Global Trade and Commerce
  • Blog
  • Publications
  • Digital Library
  • From Research to Practice
    • Day 1
    • Day 2
    • Day 3

Category Archives: Dhillon

The case for accessible audit data: tracking the effectiveness of Indian governance schemes

Dhillon, Integrity Systems, Subnational & SectoralBy Amrita DhillonJanuary 11, 2021Leave a comment

GI-ACE researcher Amrita Dhillon explores the challenges of aggregating audit data of Indian government schemes in order to create a database that is accessible to policymakers, economists and academics.

scatter chart with stylized indian flag

The flipside of corruption: State comparisons in India using public service delivery measures

Dhillon, Integrity Systems, Subnational & SectoralBy Amrita DhillonMarch 31, 20201 Comment

GI-ACE researcher Amrita Dhillon explores compositie indicators across Indian states and what insights might exist for greater service delivery and curbing corruption.

MGNREGA logo with geotagging icon and screenshots

How can top-down audits and social audits respond to the changing technology of service delivery in India? 

Dhillon, Integrity Systems, Subnational & SectoralBy Amrita DhillonNovember 14, 20191 Comment

Takeaways from GI-ACE workshop on ‘Audit and Anti-Corruption Measures in India.’

woman carrying water on unpaved road in India

Are top-down audits complements or substitutes to social audits?

Dhillon, Integrity Systems, Subnational & SectoralBy Amrita DhillonJuly 17, 2019Leave a comment

Researcher Amrita Dhillon discusses GI-ACE project focusing on two major public works programmes in India, asking how corruption in these programmes relates to the frequency of past top-down audits and/or to the frequency and intensity of social audits.

Go to Top