Can crisis preparedness prevent corruption in emergency responses?
Much attention was devoted to the corruption that dominated emergency responses during…
Read more
Are you a policymaker or technical expert? Do you have thoughts or feedback?
Get in touch: Tweet us @GlobalIntegrity or email the GI-ACE Team.
This project investigates the evidence of what regulatory frameworks, tools or novel instruments have been shown to be effective or ineffective at deterring the various enablers from contributing to illicit financial flows around the world.
Building on Phase 1 findings that uncovered informal practices of networks of political, business, and social actors that undermine anti-corruption efforts, this project works with case studies from East Africa and Central Asia to explore how anti-corruption interventions can explicitly factor in existing informal networks.
This project investigates corruption in the commodity trading sector, focusing on on three emerging developments in the industry, through which both long-standing corruption trends and new risks and opportunities can be examined: food insecurity, the climate transition, and the rise of blockchain.
The project designs and implements state-of-the-art ethics training courses with civil servants in Nepal and Bangladesh and evaluates their effects on corruption and (un)ethical behaviour in a field experiment.
Recent Posts
Global Finance and the Enablers of Corruption – Professional intermediaries and the evidence of their role in Illicit Financial Flows (IFFs)
A new report from the Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence Programme (GI-ACE) entitled…
Crosspost: Beneficial ownership transparency and the fight against grand corruption in Nigeria
This is a crosspost from OpenOwnership, in response to Jackie Harvey’s research…