Skip to content

globalintegrity.org

FacebookTwitterLinkedin
Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
  • About
    • Our Programme
    • Our Team
    • Events
    • Press
    • Multimedia
  • Projects
    • Social Norms & Behaviors & Health – Tanzania
    • Advancing Integrity – Uganda
    • Leveraging Social Audits – India
    • Cities of Integrity: Zambia and South Africa
    • Integrity & Civil Servants – Nepal & Bangladesh
    • Procurement & Red Flags
    • Preventing Medical Theft – Malawi
    • Offshore Financial Secrecy Reform
    • Regulating Cross-border trading – East Africa
    • Effective Law Enforcement – Nigeria & Malawi
    • Harnessing Informality – East & Central Africa & Kyrgyzstan
    • Beneficial Ownership – Nigeria
    • International Deal-Making
    • Anti-Money Laundering & Banking/Reputation
    • Using the Red Flags tool to curb corruption in procurement
  • Re-thinking Anti-Corruption
    • Working Paper Series
      • Approaches
      • Interactive Framework
    • Short-term Research
      • Corruption Risks in Trade and Commerce
      • Global Finance and the Enablers of Corruption
      • Crisis Responses and Corruption in Vulnerable Sectors
  • Blog
  • Publications
  • Digital Library
  • From Research to Practice
    • Day 1
    • Day 2
    • Day 3
Search
  • About
    • Our Programme
    • Our Team
    • Events
    • Press
    • Multimedia
  • Projects
    • Social Norms & Behaviors & Health – Tanzania
    • Advancing Integrity – Uganda
    • Leveraging Social Audits – India
    • Cities of Integrity: Zambia and South Africa
    • Integrity & Civil Servants – Nepal & Bangladesh
    • Procurement & Red Flags
    • Preventing Medical Theft – Malawi
    • Offshore Financial Secrecy Reform
    • Regulating Cross-border trading – East Africa
    • Effective Law Enforcement – Nigeria & Malawi
    • Harnessing Informality – East & Central Africa & Kyrgyzstan
    • Beneficial Ownership – Nigeria
    • International Deal-Making
    • Anti-Money Laundering & Banking/Reputation
    • Using the Red Flags tool to curb corruption in procurement
  • Re-thinking Anti-Corruption
    • Working Paper Series
      • Approaches
      • Interactive Framework
    • Short-term Research
      • Corruption Risks in Trade and Commerce
      • Global Finance and the Enablers of Corruption
      • Crisis Responses and Corruption in Vulnerable Sectors
  • Blog
  • Publications
  • Digital Library
  • From Research to Practice
    • Day 1
    • Day 2
    • Day 3

Category Archives: Baez Camargo_ext

Crosspost: Bribery isn’t only an exchange of money – what new research tells us about how informal networks enable corruption and vice versa

Baez Camargo_extBy Claudia Baez CamargoNovember 3, 2021Leave a comment

This is a crosspost from the Basel Institute on Governance, written by GI-ACE researcher Claudia Baez Camargo on her project on harnessing informality.   Bila watu hufiki popote. “Without people or…

networks in shape of krygystan

Informal practices and informal (governing) networks

Baez Camargo_ext, Integrity SystemsBy Scott NewtonMarch 11, 2020Leave a comment

How might knowledge about the centrality of informal social networks be used to inform the design of innovative anti-corruption approaches?

silhouettes of people - two in sunlight - with network connections overlaid

Harnessing Informality (Pt. 2): What could a network intervention to tackle anti-corruption look like?

Baez Camargo_ext, Integrity SystemsBy Claudia Baez CamargoDecember 4, 2019Leave a comment

How might knowledge about the centrality of informal social networks be used to inform the design of innovative anti-corruption approaches?

silhouettes of people - two in sunlight - with network connections overlaid

Harnessing informality for anti-corruption practice: Shifting the unit of analysis from individuals to networks

Baez Camargo_ext, Integrity SystemsBy Claudia Baez CamargoOctober 22, 2019Leave a comment

Researcher Claudia Baez Camargo writes about GI-ACE project, we adopt two perspectives to explore the question, “What would anti-corruption practice look like if we shift the unit of analysis from individuals to networks?”

Go to Top