Skip to content

globalintegrity.org

FacebookTwitterLinkedin
Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
Global Integrity Anti-Corruption Evidence
  • About
    • Our Programme
    • Our Team
    • Events
    • Press
    • Multimedia
  • Projects
    • Social Norms & Behaviors & Health – Tanzania
    • Advancing Integrity – Uganda
    • Leveraging Social Audits – India
    • Cities of Integrity: Zambia and South Africa
    • Integrity & Civil Servants – Nepal & Bangladesh
    • Procurement & Red Flags
    • Preventing Medical Theft – Malawi
    • Offshore Financial Secrecy Reform
    • Regulating Cross-border trading – East Africa
    • Effective Law Enforcement – Nigeria & Malawi
    • Harnessing Informality – East & Central Africa & Kyrgyzstan
    • Beneficial Ownership – Nigeria
    • International Deal-Making
    • Anti-Money Laundering & Banking/Reputation
    • Using the Red Flags tool to curb corruption in procurement
  • Re-thinking Anti-Corruption
    • Working Paper Series
      • Approaches
      • Interactive Framework
    • Short-term Research
      • Global Finance and the Enablers of Corruption
      • Crisis Responses and Corruption in Vulnerable Sectors
      • Corruption Risks in Global Trade and Commerce
  • Blog
  • Publications
  • Digital Library
  • From Research to Practice
    • Day 1
    • Day 2
    • Day 3
Search
  • About
    • Our Programme
    • Our Team
    • Events
    • Press
    • Multimedia
  • Projects
    • Social Norms & Behaviors & Health – Tanzania
    • Advancing Integrity – Uganda
    • Leveraging Social Audits – India
    • Cities of Integrity: Zambia and South Africa
    • Integrity & Civil Servants – Nepal & Bangladesh
    • Procurement & Red Flags
    • Preventing Medical Theft – Malawi
    • Offshore Financial Secrecy Reform
    • Regulating Cross-border trading – East Africa
    • Effective Law Enforcement – Nigeria & Malawi
    • Harnessing Informality – East & Central Africa & Kyrgyzstan
    • Beneficial Ownership – Nigeria
    • International Deal-Making
    • Anti-Money Laundering & Banking/Reputation
    • Using the Red Flags tool to curb corruption in procurement
  • Re-thinking Anti-Corruption
    • Working Paper Series
      • Approaches
      • Interactive Framework
    • Short-term Research
      • Global Finance and the Enablers of Corruption
      • Crisis Responses and Corruption in Vulnerable Sectors
      • Corruption Risks in Global Trade and Commerce
  • Blog
  • Publications
  • Digital Library
  • From Research to Practice
    • Day 1
    • Day 2
    • Day 3

Daily Archives: July 8, 2019

procurement notebook on desk with pad of paper and pencil holder - red sticky notes have red flag indicators noted on them throughout the image

Using ‘red flag’ indicators to identify corruption and analyse reform efforts in the procurement process

David-Barrett, International ArchitectureBy Liz David-BarrettJuly 8, 20191 Comment

In this GI-ACE project, data is used to develop new proxy indicators of corruption risk, based on ‘red flags’ in the tendering process, and then used to test how patterns of corruption differ across contexts and whether anti-corruption efforts work.

Go to Top